Charles Heisen v. Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc., a California Company David Lucchetti Albert K. Mueller Jean Rodney, Esq. Mark Begnaud, Esq.

26 F.3d 130 1994-2 Trade Cases P 70,839 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles HEISEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., a California Company; David Lucchetti; Albert K. Mueller; Jean Rodney, Esq.; Mark Begnaud, Esq., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16661. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 9, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Heisen appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his antitrust action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. We review de novo, Les Shockley Racing, Inc. v. National Hot Rod Ass'n, 884 F.2d 504 , 507 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 3 The discord between the parties to this appeal dates back to July 30, 1988, when Heisen hired a bulldozer and directed its operator to sever the primary commercial access road to a plant owned by Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc. ("PABCO"). PABCO…