Marshbanks v. Lewis

Good Law
26 F.3d 131·1994 WL 249999·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21647
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 199493-17259California844 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Phuong MARSHBANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; Dale Copeland, Warden; Angelo Daniels, Deputy Warden; Jim Charles, Medical Administrator; and Dale Palmer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17259. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 9, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Phuong Marshbanks, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Marshbank's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 prisoner civil rights action alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Jones v. Union Pacific R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). A grant of summary judgment should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.