Robert E. Maury v. Tam Bui, Dr., Staff Physician

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert E. MAURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tam BUI, Dr., Staff Physician, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17309. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Robert Edward Maury appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Dr. Tam Bui in Maury's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs based on Dr. Bui's treatment of Maury's stomach pain. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 1 3 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Smith v. Noonan, 992 F.2d 987, 989 (9th Cir.1993). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, we must determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied…