Fred Marasco v. Ray Procunier Melonese Harrison John & Jane Does I-Xx

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Fred MARASCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray PROCUNIER; Melonese Harrison; John & Jane Does I-XX, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16526. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Fred Marasco, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in Marasco's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights regarding a back injury Marasco suffered when he slipped and fell in the prison shower. Marasco also appeals the district court's denial of his motion for default judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. I. Summary Judgment 3 Marasco contends that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by (1) subjecting him to inadequate housing, (2)…