Soo Ja Oh v. Resolution Trust Corporation, Dba Great American Savings and Loan Association, F.A.

Good Law
26 F.3d 131·1994 WL 249988·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21644
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 199492-16760California1,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Soo Ja OH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, dba Great American Savings and Loan Association, F.A., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16760. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1994. * Decided June 9, 1994. Before: FERGUSON, NOONAN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff Soo Ja Oh appeals the district court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Resolution Trust Corporation ("RTC"), dba Great American Savings and Loan Association, F.A. ("Great American"). The district court rejected Oh's claims for specific performance or rescission of a written real estate agreement and held that Oh must forfeit to RTC her $200,000 deposit as liquidated damages. It awarded attorney's fees to RTC and declined to impose Rule 11 sanctions on Oh. We affirm. A. Removal Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1441 3 The RTC may rely on Sec. 1441 because it is Great…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.