Gary L. Lekvold v. Westinghouse Hanford Co., a Delaware Corporation Westinghouse Electric Corp., a Pennsylvania Corporation

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary L. LEKVOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE HANFORD CO., a Delaware Corporation; Westinghouse Electric Corp., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35271. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1993. Submission Withdrawn Nov. 4, 1993. Resubmitted May 17, 1994. Decided May 19, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, GOODWIN, and HUG, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Gary L. Lekvold appeals a summary judgment in favor of the defense in Lekvold's damages action alleging that the defendants retaliated against him for "whistleblowing" activities, in violation of his federal constitutional rights. We affirm. 3 At all times relevant to this appeal, Lekvold was a senior security engineer assigned to the Security Application Center at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation ("Hanford"), located in Hanford, Washington. Hanford is owned by the United States, but is managed by private…