Kalama

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. KALAMA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16863. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 15, 1994. * Decided June 6, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and LETTS, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM *** Harold K. Kalama and Kim L. Kalama ("the Kalamas") appeal pro se the district court's order directing the clerk of the court not to file the Kalamas' complaint against the United States. The district court acted pursuant to a 1987 pre-filing order entered by another district court judge, which barred the Kalamas from filing any further pleadings without obtaining a court order. The Kalamas filed a timely appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . FACTUAL SUMMARY In a case filed in the Northern District of California, Kalama v. Hora, et al., No. C-86-6630-RFP, the Kalamas contested certain rulings against…