Joseph M. Kadans Adele Kadans v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Good Law
26 F.3d 131·1994 WL 242112·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 199493-15583California1,069 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph M. KADANS; Adele Kadans, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15583. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1994. * Decided June 3, 1994. Before: FERGUSON, NOONAN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Adele Kadans and Joseph Kadans, an attorney, appeal pro se from the district court's summary judgment for defendant Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. (CMI). The parties are familiar with the facts and proceedings, so we need not recite them here. We affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment to CMI. 3 The district court's grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Jones v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, this court must determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.