Frederick H. Kohler v. Bryn Armstrong

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederick H. KOHLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryn ARMSTRONG; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17003. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 14, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederick Kohler, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners and its members. Kohler alleged that his due process rights were violated when the Parole Commission reviewed his parole status. The district court dismissed Kohler's action for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 Dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo. Oscar v. University Students Co-op. Ass'n, 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 655 (1992). Dismissal is improper…