Manuel Jimenez, AKA "Manny," v. United States

Good Law
26 F.3d 131·1994 WL 202453·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 199493-15699California543 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Manuel JIMENEZ, aka "Manny," Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15699. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 24, 1994. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Manuel Jimenez appeals an order denying his petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . He contends that the district court's correction of sentence by imposing a statutorily required three-year period of supervised release in his absence violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 43 and his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not notify him of the court's intent to impose the period of supervised release and allow him to challenge it. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Assuming for purposes of this appeal that Jimenez's challenge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.