The People of the Territory of Guam v. Albert Blas Camacho

26 F.3d 131 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert Blas CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10246. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 24, 1994. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Albert Blas Camacho appeals the order of the District Court of Guam, Appellate Division, affirming his conviction in the Superior Court of Guam of one count of first degree criminal sexual conduct under 9 Guam Code Ann. Sec. 25.15(a)(1) and two counts of second degree criminal sexual conduct under 9 Guam Code Ann. Sec. 25.20(a)(1)-(2). Camacho argues that the court improperly allowed hearsay testimony by the victims' father that Camacho's mother and wife had said he admitted what he had done, and that his Sixth Amendment confrontation clause rights were violated. We have jurisdiction, 48 U.S.C. Sec. 1424-3 (c), and we affirm Camacho's…