Jack R. Tweedy v. United States

Good Law
26 F.3d 132·1994 WL 245894·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21681
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 199493-35160California1,491 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 132 74 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -5003 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack R. TWEEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35160. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jack R. Tweedy appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the United States in his action brought under (1) 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2410 seeking to quiet title to certain personal property on which the United States claims a tax lien, and (2) 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7431 seeking damages for allegedly unauthorized disclosure of Tweedy's tax return information. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Standard of Review 4 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Smith v. Noonan, 992 F.2d 987, 989 (9th Cir.1993). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.