Richard C. Thompson v. State of Arizona

26 F.3d 132 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard C. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16706. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 14, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard C. Thompson appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the State of Arizona (the State) in his employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, et seq. (Title VII). Thompson contends that the district court erred by finding that (1) he failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation, (2) he failed to offer specific evidence that the State breached a 1985 settlement agreement, and (3) that he failed to establish discrimination under Title VII in the State's decision not to hire him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3…