Skelly v. Heidemann

26 F.3d 132 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tom SKELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sara HEIDEMANN (f/k/a Skelly); Denise Read, Dep. Pros. Attorney; Kim Schnvelle, Dep. Pros. Attorney; Carlos Y. Velategui, Family Court Commissioner; T. Baker, Support Enf. Officer; King County, Wa, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-36085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tom Skelly appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). Skelly filed this action against his ex-wife and her attorney, a county prosecutor, a family-court commissioner, a support-enforcement officer, and King County. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Skelly contends that the district court erred by adopting a magistrate's recommendation that Skelly's action be dismissed on…