Gary St. Hilaire v. Sam Lewis, Director

26 F.3d 132 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary ST. HILAIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam LEWIS, Director; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15129. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary St. Hilaire, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. St. Hilaire alleged, in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, that the defendants violated his civil rights by: (1) using money from an "Activities and Recreation Fund" to purchase books for the prison law library; (2) transferring him to a lockdown unit; (3) calling him names; (4) denying his request for an HIV test; and (5) withholding his legal research. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 "A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo to determine, viewing the evidence in the…