Leon Sanders v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
Opinion
Opinion
26 F.3d 132 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leon SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56378. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided May 27, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-93-02426-RJK; Robert J. Kelleher, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leon Sanders appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action for breach of contract and wrongful termination. The court dismissed the action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, see California Elec. Co. v. Briley, 939 F.2d 790, 792 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1478 (1992), and affirm. 3 * Breach of Contract 4 In support of his claim…