Terry Prince v. Charles Marshall Attorney General of the State of California

26 F.3d 132 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Terry PRINCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles MARSHALL; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-56466. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 9, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Terry Prince, a California state prisoner, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition. Prince was convicted, following a jury trial, for first degree murder with the special circumstance that he committed the murder during a robbery, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. He contends that he received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in state court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1122 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 3 To show ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant…