United States v. Ramon Bonillo-Castro

26 F.3d 133 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon BONILLO-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50511. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 14, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Bonillo-Castro appeals his 120-month sentence imposed following remand from this court for resentencing. Bonillo-Castro was originally sentenced following entry of a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1), and carrying a firearm during the commission of a narcotics offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bonillo-Castro's counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record and submitted a brief identifying two possible issues for review: (1) whether the district court erred by failing to recuse itself for…