United States v. John Difronzo, United States of America v. Donald J. Angelini

26 F.3d 133 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John DIFRONZO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald J. ANGELINI, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50417, 93-50444. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 5, 1994. Decided May 24, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Nos. CR-92-00026-02-E, CR-92-26-03-WBE, William B. Enright, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Before: HALL, LEAVY and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 In these consolidated appeals, Donald John Angelini and John DiFronzo appeal their convictions for conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 , and mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1341 & 1343, as well as the sentence each received for these convictions. 3 * Appellants claim that the subject…