United States v. John Gable, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Ann Funderburk, United States of America v. John G. Thomas

Good Law
26 F.3d 133·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 199493-30061California4,466 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 133 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John GABLE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Ann FUNDERBURK, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John G. THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30061, 93-30127 and 93-30173. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 7, 1994. Decided June 15, 1994. Before: HUG, HALL, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants John Gable, Mary Ann Funderburk and John Thomas were all participants in an interstate prostitution business which operated from 1987 to 1991. Appellants were charged with money laundering, interstate transportation for purposes of prostitution, and Travel Act violations, as well as conspiracy relative to these allegations. 3 The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.