United States v. Luis Carnet

Good Law
26 F.3d 133·1994 WL 266104·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 199492-50424California767 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 133 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis CARNET, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50424. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1994. * Decided June 15, 1994. Before: FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Luis Carnet appeals from his sentence of 235 months' imprisonment for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The sentence is affirmed. 3 * Carnet first argues that the district court erroneously believed that there was no basis for a two-point downward adjustment for Carnet's minor role in the offense, pursuant to section 3B1.2 of the Sentencing Guidelines, because the district court did not consider all relevant conduct, including collateral conduct beyond the charged offense. See United States v. Webster, 996 F.2d 209, 212 (9th Cir.1993). The Guidelines define a minor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.