United States v. George Drucker

26 F.3d 133 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George DRUCKER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10252. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 9, 1994. * Decided May 18, 1994. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, No. CR-91-00245-LDG-(RLH); John C. Coughenour, ** District Judge, Presiding. 2 D. Nev. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 BEFORE: WALLACE, CHOY, Circuit Judges, and McGOVERN, *** District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM **** 6 On July 7, 1993, George Drucker was convicted after a jury trial of mail fraud, conspiracy, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1341 , 371 and 2. Drucker appeals this conviction, and we affirm. 7 Drucker's first contention is that the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of Drucker's false statement on an insurance application that he had not sustained a loss in the past five years, when in fact he had reported the loss by theft of an…