United States v. Hilario Figueroa

26 F.3d 133 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hilario FIGUEROA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50765. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 1, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hilario Figueroa appeals his eighteen-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession of counterfeit immigration documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1546 (a). Figueroa contends that the district court erred by making an two-level upward adjustment in his offense level based upon its finding that he supervised or managed another criminally responsible person. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 We review for clear error whether a defendant was "an organizer, leader, manager or supervisor." United States v. Hoac, 990 F.2d 1099, 1110 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1075 (1994). 4 To warrant a…