United States v. Jui Ho Chung, Aka: Rey Ho Chung Aka: Michael Chung

26 F.3d 133 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jui Ho CHUNG, aka: Rey Ho Chung; aka: Michael Chung, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50290. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Chung appeals his 78-month sentence following his guilty plea conviction to conspiracy to launder money in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 , 1956(a)(1), and money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1956 (a)(1), (a)(3). 3 Chung contends that the district court failed to comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) by not attaching its written findings concerning a disputed matter with the presentence report. 4 Rule 32 requires the district court to make factual findings regarding any disputed issue or to make a determination that no such finding is necessary because it will not take the controverted…