United States v. Marcia Buse
Opinion
Opinion
26 F.3d 133 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcia BUSE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10044. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 19, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marcia Buse appeals her sentence imposed following entry of her guilty plea for false representations regarding social security information in violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1307 . Buse contends the government breached the plea agreement in its interpretation of a provision regarding the amount of loss. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 1 3 Here, the plea agreement provided that, for purposes of determining amount of loss, Buse was "liable only for those then-open accounts or transactions arranged through false pretenses as to which she did not make minimum monthly payments." The government argued at sentencing that Buse was…