United States v. Paula S. Hubbard, United States of America v. Shelah Doucette, United States of America v. Thelma J. Grady

26 F.3d 134 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paula S. HUBBARD, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shelah DOUCETTE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thelma J. GRADY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10066, 93-10074 and 93-10078. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1994 in Nos. 93-10066 and 93-10074. Submitted April 11, 1994 * in No. 93-10078. Decided June 2, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 These appeals all arise out of various transactions conducted by the appellants while they were employed by the Sutter Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service ("ASCS"). Shelah Doucette and Paula Hubbard were convicted of several counts of embezzlement and improper receipt of money from a Commodity Credit Corporation transaction, in violation of 15 U.S.C.…