United States v. Billie Jo Gustafson

26 F.3d 134 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billie Jo GUSTAFSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50594, 93-50597. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 1, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Billie Jo Gustafson appeals her conviction and eighteen-month sentence imposed following her guilty plea to armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a), (d), and the district court's pre-conviction order denying a motion for expert services. Gustafson contends that: (1) her guilty plea was involuntary, (2) the district court erred by denying her motion for expert services, and (3) the district court's order denying her motion for expert services resulted in the denial of due process at the sentencing hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We dismiss in part and vacate…