United States v. Rosa Elia Ramirez-Garcia

Good Law
26 F.3d 134·1994 WL 209819·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21496
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 199493-50310California1,264 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 134 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rosa Elia RAMIREZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50310. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 2, 1994. * Decided May 25, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Rosa Elia Ramirez-Garcia appeals her jury conviction for possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1) and importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 952 (a). Ramirez-Garcia contended that the district court erred in admitting testimony regarding profiles of drug couriers and in admitting testimony regarding the street value of the narcotics. We affirm. I. 4 On November 30, 1992 Ramirez-Garcia purchased with cash a round trip ticket on AeroMexico from Los Angeles to Zihuatenejo, Mexico via Mexico City. Ramirez-Garcia departed Los Angeles on December 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.