United States v. Gary Russell Hadden, United States of America v. Gary Russell Hadden

26 F.3d 134 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Russell HADDEN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Russell HADDEN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10429, 93-10438. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 19, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Gary Russell Hadden appeals his 105-month sentence imposed following guilty pleas to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a), in two consolidated cases. Hadden contends for the first time on appeal that he was sentenced in violation of the plea agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. Because Hadden alleges that his sentence was imposed in violation of the plea agreement, we consider his appeal despite the waiver of the right to appeal in the plea agreement. See United States v. Gonzalez, 16 F.3d 985,…