United States v. Bradley Scott Holz

26 F.3d 134 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bradley Scott HOLZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10553. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 14, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bradley Scott Holz appeals his sentence of twelve months and one day imposed after a guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922 (g)(1), 924. Holz contends that the district court erred by denying a six-level downward adjustment to his base offense level because he possessed the firearm for sporting or collection purposes. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 We review for clear error the district court's factual finding that a defendant did not possess a firearm solely for sporting or collection purposes. United States v. Gavilan, 966 F.2d 530, 531 (9th Cir.1992); United…