United States v. Miguel Lugo-Hernandez

Good Law
26 F.3d 134·1994 WL 235323·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21512
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 199493-50329California1,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 134 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel LUGO-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50329. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 1, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Miguel Lugo-Hernandez appeals following entry of his guilty plea to aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute two kilograms of cocaine and carrying a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 , 924(c)(1) and 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Lugo-Hernandez's attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which listed the following issues for review: (1) whether the waiver of his right to appeal in his plea agreement precluded review of sentencing issues; (2) whether that waiver was voluntary; (3) whether he received ineffective assistance of counsel; (4) whether his guilty plea was involuntary; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.