United States v. Bradley E. Vote

26 F.3d 135 74 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -5080 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bradley E. VOTE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-15774. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bradley E. Vote appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment and order of foreclosure in favor of the United States in the government's action seeking to (1) reduce a 1983 tax assessment against Vote to judgment, (2) set aside a fraudulent property conveyance, and (3) foreclose a tax lien on that property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. We also impose $1,500 damages as a sanction against Vote for filing a frivolous appeal. 3 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Jones v. Union Pac. R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). A grant of summary judgment should…