United States v. George Sheng

26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George SHENG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10631. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 19, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Sheng appeals his conviction following jury trial for aiding and abetting the trafficking of counterfeit goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2320 , 2 and entry of a nolo contendere plea to infringement of a copyright in violation of 17 U.S.C. Sec. 506 (a). Sheng's attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified the following issues for review: (1) whether the district court erroneously denied a pretrial discovery motion; (2) whether Sheng voluntarily consented to two searches; (3) whether the district court erred by denying the motion for a bill of particulars; (4) whether Sheng was entrapped as…