United States v. 39.63 Acres of Land, Fortuna Land Company, Fortuna Land Co., and Zinigan Land Company v. Greg K. Webster, Trustee-Appellant. United States of America v. 8.56 Acres of Land, Fortuna Land Company, and Greg K. Webster, Trustee-Appellant

Good Law
26 F.3d 135·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21536
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 199492-16584California476 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 39.63 ACRES OF LAND, FORTUNA LAND COMPANY, et al., Defendant, FORTUNA LAND CO., And Zinigan Land Company, Defendant-Appellee, v. Greg K. WEBSTER, Trustee-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 8.56 ACRES OF LAND, FORTUNA LAND COMPANY, et al., Defendant, and Greg K. WEBSTER, Trustee-Appellant. Nos. 92-16584, 92-16585. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 9, 1994. Decided May 24, 1994. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 We affirm the district court on the grounds specified in Judge Orrick's well-reasoned order. The bankruptcy estate had no legal or equitable interest in the real property at the time the stay of the federal condemnation action was sought. The estate only had an interest in a claim to an equitable interest in the real property. Only if the state court had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.