United States v. Ernesto Traslavina

26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernesto TRASLAVINA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-15387. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 1, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernesto Traslavina appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion challenging his conviction for conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. We previously affirmed his conviction on direct appeal in an unpublished memorandum disposition. Traslavina contends the trial court erred by refusing to extend the time to file his late suppression motion. He further argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel from both his trial and appellate counsel. 1 We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 * Motion to Suppress 4 Section…