Ventoza v. International Longshoremen & Warehousemen Union

Good Law
26 F.3d 135·1994 WL 235324·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21548
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 199493-35574California872 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Matthew R. VENTOZA; Candice Scott; Harold Ugles; Brad Bakken; Barry Brockmann, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTL LONGSHOREMEN & WAREHOUSEMEN UNION; ILWU Local # 19, Defendants, and Gene Minetti, Intervenor-Appellant. No. 93-35574. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 1, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gene Minetti appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a) motion to intervene in a certified class action lawsuit brought by identified casual (non-registered) longshore workers against the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 19 (ILWU), and the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's denial of a Rule 24(a) motion to intervene as of right. 1 Scotts Valley Band of Pomo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.