United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Edward Harry Weekley, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Edward Harry WEEKLEY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 92-30174, 92-30187. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 2, 1994. Decided May 18, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, SCHROEDER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Weekley appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 A. The court did not err when it instructed the jury to rely 4 on its independent recollection of trial 5 testimony. 6 Weekley argues that the court erred when prior to voir dire it instructed the jury that 7 we are without a court reporter so you will know that at the end of the case there's no transcript of the testimony handed to you, and there's not such transcript available even when the court reporter is here.…