United States v. Victor Rueda Francisco Gamez-Garcia
Opinion
Opinion
26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor RUEDA; Francisco Gamez-Garcia, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-50295, 93-50296. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 6, 1994. * Decided May 27, 1994. 1 Before: BROWNING and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 * Rueda and Garcia appeal their sentences imposed for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. 4 Between November 16 and November 23, 1992, Garcia, Rueda, and two codefendants agreed to sell 8,079 grams of methamphetamine to undercover DEA Agent Reynoso. The transaction was to take place on November 24, 1992. Garcia was posted to do surveillance. The four codefendants were arrested immediately after one of the codefendants opened the rear of the car and displayed the drugs. 5 The four defendants were charged with conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to…