United States v. Francisco Rodriguez-Martinez

26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10220, 93-15232. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1993. Decided June 1, 1994. As Amended July 25, 1994. Before: BOOCHEVER, THOMPSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Francisco Rodriguez-Martinez ("Rodriguez") was convicted of possession with intent to distribute one kilogram of cocaine. Rodriguez appeals his conviction and the subsequent denial of his section 2255 motion. 1 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We affirm. 3 * Rodriguez contends that the government failed to provide him with informant Paul Kaufman's conviction record in a timely manner. A prosecutor must disclose Brady material only at a time when the disclosure remains of value to a defendant. United States v. Span, 970 F.2d 573, 583 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1283 (1993). Rodriguez's…