United States v. Raymond Adam Wustrack

26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Adam WUSTRACK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10531. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 9, 1994. * Decided May 18, 1994. Before FARRIS, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Raymond Wustrack appeals his jury conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 , and possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). He argues that the district court erred in admitting evidence of a coconspirator's purchase of crystal methamphetamine, and that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of possession with intent to distribute. Wustrack further contends that the district court erred in increasing his base offense level for obstruction of justice under Sec. 3C1.1 of the Sentencing…