United States v. Bernard Cedric Renfroe

Good Law
26 F.3d 135·1994 WL 259768·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21554
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 199491-50873California950 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard Cedric RENFROE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50873. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 14, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Defendant-Appellant, Bernard Cedric Renfroe, was convicted of distributing 72 grams of cocaine base and of possessing with intent to distribute 102 grams of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Although Renfroe initially was sentenced to 188 months in prison, the district judge granted him a two-point downward departure for acceptance of responsibility and his sentence was reduced to 151 months in prison and five years of supervised release. We have jurisdiction over Renfroe's appeal under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. DISCUSSION I. Admission of the Transcripts 3 Renfroe claims that he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.