John Wyse v. George Ingle, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

26 F.3d 136 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John WYSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George INGLE, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-56016. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner John Wyse appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction for first degree murder with a weapons use enhancement. Wyse contends that the trial court's admission of an informant's unsworn statement as a prior inconsistent statement to impeach the informant's testimony violated his Fourth and Sixth Amendment rights. We review allegations of confrontation clause violations for harmless error. United States v. Bernard S., 795 F.2d 749, 756 (9th Cir.1986). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and we…