The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (Wutc) v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Bonneville Power Administration, Public Power Council Direct Service Industrial Customers (Aluminum Co. Of America, Atochem North America, Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corp., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., Intalco Aluminum Corp.), Respondents-Intervenors. Puget Sound Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Bonneville Power Administration, Direct Service Industrial Customers (Aluminum Co. Of America, Atochem North America, Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corp., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., Intalco Aluminum Corp.), Respondents-Intervenors

26 F.3d 935 29 Fed.R.Serv.3d 628 The WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (WUTC), Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION; Bonneville Power Administration, Respondents, Public Power Council; Direct Service Industrial Customers (Aluminum Co. of America, Atochem North America, Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corp., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., Intalco Aluminum Corp., et al.), Respondents-Intervenors. PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION; Bonneville Power Administration, Respondents, Direct Service Industrial Customers (Aluminum Co. of America, Atochem North America, Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corp., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., Intalco Aluminum Corp., et al.), Respondents-Intervenors. Nos. 91-70619, 91-70628. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 1993. Decided June 7, 1994. Robert D. Cedarbaum, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paul Curl, Kenneth L. Elgin, Olympia, WA, Sherilyn Peterson, Perkins Coie, Bellevue, WA, for petitioners. Joel M. Cockrell, Washington, DC, Thomas C. Lee, Asst. U.S. Atty., Geoffrey M. Kronick, Randy…