Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Legal and Professional Publications, Inc. v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Legal and Professional Publications, Inc. v. Multistate Legal Studies, Inc.

Good Law
26 F.3d 948·94 Daily Journal DAR 7814·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13580·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4203
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 8, 199493-55324California2,870 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 948 1994-1 Trade Cases P 70,617 HARCOURT BRACE JOVANOVICH LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MULTISTATE LEGAL STUDIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant. HARCOURT BRACE JOVANOVICH LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MULTISTATE LEGAL STUDIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-56488, 93-55324. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 1994. Decided June 8, 1994. Robert Fabrikant, Sidley & Austin, Los Angeles, CA, for appellant Multistate Legal Studies. Joseph Wheeler, Kenneth M. Fitzgerald and Roman Lifson, Latham & Watkins, San Diego, CA, for appellee Harcourt Brace. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge NOONAN. NOONAN, Circuit Judge: 1 In these consolidated appeals Multistate Legal Studies, Inc. (Multistate) appeals a finding that it is in contempt of a consent decree arrived at in litigation with Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Legal and Professional Publications, Inc. (Harcourt). It also appeals its failure to obtain a contempt judgment against Harcourt and the award…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.