In Re Days California Riverside Limited Partnership

Good Law
27 F.3d 374·94 Daily Journal DAR 8206·25 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1255·31 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 877·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 199492-16536California2,281 words

Opinion

Opinion

27 F.3d 374 63 USLW 2002 , 31 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 877 , 25 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1255 , Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,966 In re DAYS CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; Days California La Palma Limited Partnership; Chesterfield Century City Limited Partnership, Debtor. FINANCIAL SECURITY ASSURANCE, INC., Appellant, v. DAYS CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; Days California La Palma Limited Partnership; Chesterfield Century City Limited Partnership, Appellees. No. 92-16536. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 13, 1994. June 14, 1994. Russell D. Pollock and Rodney C. Gilmore, Greene, Radovsky, Maloney & Share, San Francisco, CA, for appellant. Maureen McQuaid, Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, San Francisco, CA, for appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Before: SCHROEDER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and JONES * , District Judge. Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Dissent by Judge SCHROEDER. NOONAN, Circuit Judge: 1 This case requires decision of a question hitherto undecided by us: whether in California the revenues of a hotel can, to any degree, remain, after bankruptcy, covered by a security…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.