In Re Pacific-Atlantic Trading Co., a California Corporation, Debtor. Edward F. Towers, Trustee v. Chickering & Gregory, a Partnership

Good Law
27 F.3d 401·94 Daily Journal DAR 8544·1994 WL 267945·25 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1300·31 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 882
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 199492-15362California2,440 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

Opinion by Judge HUG.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether a trustee’s failure to pay the full amount of a debtor’s rent obligation, under a nonresidential real estate lease, for the period following the order for relief but prior to rejection of the lease, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365 (d)(3), gives rise to an administrative claim for the full amount of the rent accrued during that period, regardless of the actual value conferred by the lease upon the estate. We conclude that it does.

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1986, Chickering and Gregory (“Chick-ering”) entered into a sublease with Pacific-Atlantic Trading Corporation (“Pacific”). Under this lease, Pacific sublet approximately 26,645 square feet of office space on the 22nd and 23rd floors of Three Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, California. The term of this lease was July 1,1986 to February 28, 1992. Commencing August 1, 1986, the rent was $46,628.75 per month in advance,- along with any additional charges imposed upon Chickering by its lessor under the master lease. Pacific also leased a certain amount of storage space in the building for an additional monthly charge.

On September 15, 1988, an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.