United States v. Ronald Dean Walker

Good Law
27 F.3d 417·94 Daily Journal DAR 8582·1994 WL 269996·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15163·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4646
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 199493-50621California896 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

Opinion by Judge FARRIS.

Ronald Walker appeals his sentence for illegally possessing firearms in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 (d), 5861(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.

I. FACTS

Walker was charged with ten counts of illegally possessing firearms. He pled guilty to Counts 1 and 10. Count 1 charged that on or about March 17, 1993, Walker possessed an unregistered Sten 9 millimeter machine gun in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (d). Count 10 charged that on or about April 9, 1993, Walker possessed a 9 millimeter stainless steel silencer not identified by serial number in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (i).

At his sentencing hearing, Walker urged a downward departure on the basis of “self-inflicted punishment.” He introduced a report of a psychological examination which concluded that after his arrest, Walker began experiencing anxiety attacks, had trouble sleeping and was placed on antidepressant medication. Walker feared that if he was incarcerated he would lose his employment and be unable to support his family. The district court ruled that it could not depart downward on the basis of self-inflicted punishment. The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.