Anderson v. Vasquez

Good Law
28 F.3d 104·1994 WL 362699·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25327
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 199492-16631California1,967 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 104 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James P. ANDERSON, Mark Bradford, Herbert Coddington, Kenneth B. Gay, Randy Haskett, Michael S. Hill, Shawn Hill, Daniel S. Jenkins, Ronald L. Sanders, James R. Scott, Richard B. Stewart, Melvin Turner, Michael J. Wader, Darren Wader, Darren C. Williams, Jane Does 1-15, John and Jane Doe Grandparents 1-30, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel VASQUEZ, in his official capacity as Warden of San Quentin Prison, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16631. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1994. Decided July 13, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and WILSON, District Judge 1 MEMORANDUM 2 I. 2 Presently before the Court is a Civil Rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The District Court dismissed the action with prejudice by means of an order dated August 21, 1992. The District Court also denied Appellants leave to amend for purposes of adding a claim under the Equal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.