In re American Continental Corporation/Lincoln Sav. & Loan Securities Litigation

Good Law
28 F.3d 104·1994 WL 201195·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25314
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199493-15131California1,650 words

Opinion

Opinion

28 F.3d 104 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8628 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re AMERICAN CONTINENTAL CORPORATION/LINCOLN SAVINGS & LOAN SECURITIES LITIGATION, Debtor. Sarah B. SHIELDS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Charles H. KEATING, Jr., et al., Defendants, and Conley D. Wolfswinkel, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-15131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1994. Decided May 23, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and WILSON, District Judge * . 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Conley D. Wolfswinkel appeals from a judgment entered against him based upon securities fraud, RICO, and various state law causes of action. All of the claims against him arose out of his participation in real estate transactions with American Continental Corporation (ACC), Lincoln Savings & Loan (Lincoln), and Charles Keating. We affirm. BACKGROUND 4 A class action was filed by Sarah B. Shields 1 for herself and other purchasers of ACC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.