Robert Bartlett v. Carlos Ortiz, Warden, Fci Bastrop, Texas

28 F.3d 104 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert BARTLETT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carlos ORTIZ, Warden, FCI Bastrop, Texas, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35811. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided July 8, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Bartlett, a federal prisoner serving a concurrent state sentence, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition, challenging his jury conviction for three counts of first degree robbery, in Clakamas County, Oregon, Circuit Court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review the denial of Bartlett's habeas petition de novo, Henry v. Estelle, 993 F.2d 1423, 1425 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm. 3 Bartlett's only claim of error on appeal is that the district court erred in failing to vacate his robbery convictions based on a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the…